logo

Preservation News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
6/2/2004
For More Information:
Contact:
Elizabeth Ouzts
(919) 833-0015 ex. 102
Margaret Hartzell
(919) 833-0015 ex. 100

Even in Tight Budget Times, Majority of NC Voters Favor Open Space Protection

 

Advocates Urge Lawmakers to Fund Land Conservation in Upcoming Fiscal Year

As the new home of NCPIRG's environmental work, Environment North Carolina can be contacted with any questions regarding this news release. 

RALEIGH—Even in tight budget times, 59 percent of North Carolina voters support funding protections of forests, farmlands, and other open spaces, according to a newly released poll. The opinion poll, conducted by the non-partisan Kitchens Group, based in Maitland, Florida, surveyed voters across the state in March 2004.

Armed with this and other information, land conservation advocates traveled to Raleigh today to urge lawmakers to protect and bolster North Carolina's open space protection programs.

"Even while the state tightens its belt, NC voters support nourishing open space protection," said Elizabeth Ouzts, director of the NC Public Interest Research Group (NCPIRG). "The state's loss of open space is the sixth-fastest in the country. Voters recognize that if we don't preserve our forests and farmlands now, they will be lost forever to development."

The poll, conducted for The Nature Conservancy, Trust for Public Land, the American Farmland Trust, the NC Parks and Recreation Society, Conservation Trust for NC, and NCPIRG, showed growing concern over the state's rapid growth. Among the key findings:

• 43 percent said they thought growth and development of land in their area of the state was occurring too rapidly and that steps needed to be taken to discourage more growth. This figure is up significantly from 31 percent who responded the same way to this question in a poll conducted in June 2002.

• More than 70 percent of respondents saw loss of farmland and loss of wildlife habitat as a problem in North Carolina.

• 86 percent would be more likely to support a state level land protection program if it protected rivers like the Catawba, French Broad and Neuse.

• 82 percent would be more likely to support a state level land protection program if it protected small family farms and farmland.

Supporters of land conservation, including representatives from the military and tourism sectors, pressed lawmakers to adequately fund key land conservation programs: the Clean Water Management Trust Fund, the Natural Heritage Trust Fund, the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund and the Farmland Preservation Trust Fund. These advocates say that spending state dollars to protect natural areas, such as an expanded Lake James State Park in Burke County and natural buffer zones around the state's military bases, makes economic sense even in tight budget times.

"Adding 3,000 acres and 30 miles of shoreline to the Lake James State Park is a smart investment," said Tom Johnson, Chairman of Burke County Commissioners. "Preserving this natural area near the Pisgah National Forest will create a destination for tourists and help attract businesses and retirees to the region."

Land conservation advocates urged funding the Clean Water Management Trust Fund at $100 million, the Farmland Preservation Fund at $2.3 million, and to maintain current funding for the Parks and Recreation and Natural Heritage Trust Funds. Proponents also lobbied lawmakers to approve companion bills, introduced by Rep. Gordon Allen and Sen. John Kerr, that would allow financing the purchase of natural areas that may vanish to development in future years.

"The Clean Water Management Trust Fund, Farmland Preservation Trust Fund, Natural Heritage Trust Fund, and Parks & Recreation Trust Fund help protect water quality and the environment," said former Rep. Phil Baddour, board member of the Clean Water Management Trust Fund. "Preserving open space helps our military bases and our economy."