logo

Energy News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2006-01-31
For More Information:
Contact:
Elizabeth Ouzts
(919) 833-0015 ex. 102
Margaret Hartzell
(919) 833-0015 ex. 100

Environment North Carolina Statement on State of the Union Address

 

It is good news that President Bush is finally recognizing what many have sensed for a long time; that we are dangerously reliant on oil in ways that our economy and our environment can no longer tolerate.  But this 11th hour conversion does not square with his administration’s track record or the reality of his current plan.

If President Bush is serious about moving us in a new direction on energy he would be: 

Committing to renewable energy by following the lead of 20 states and the District of Columbia, with minimum renewable energy requirements.   By 2017, these state renewable energy requirements will result in enough renewable energy to power 20 million homes.  Instead, the Bush Administration and their allies in Congress have blocked a provision in the 2005 Energy Policy Act, which would have required utilities to make at least 10% of their electricity from renewables by 2020. 

Committing to Cleaner More Fuel Efficient Automobiles instead of standing in the way of at least 10 states (CA, WA, OR, NJ, NY, CT, MA, RI, ME and VT)   that have adopted clean cars standards that would put more hybrids and advanced technology cars on the road; which will reduce pollution and reduce gasoline consumption by billions of gallons per year.   

Committing to Energy Efficiency as the fastest and cheapest way to address our energy needs. Ten states (WA, OR, CA, AZ, MD, NJ, NY, CT, RI, MA); frustrated by federal in action, adopted energy efficiency standards which will save consumers in those states billions of dollars. If the Administration followed the lead of Massachusetts and adopted the efficiency standard for furnaces and boilers the savings nationally would be 4.5 billion dollars annually and equal 1% of today’s natural gas consumption.   Instead, the administration has dragged its feet in adopting energy efficiency standards and only responded when sued or pressured by the states.  

Promoting Energy Conservation.  The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy has found that a 2 percent reduction in electricity and natural gas demand could trigger a 25 percent reduction in wholesale natural gas prices within a single year.  Instead the Administration has cut weatherization programs and fuel assistance for low income Americans to balance the budget while allowing the oil industry off the hook for millions of dollars in royalties at a time of record profits. 

Promoting Clean Energy Sources which are cheaper and quicker to bring on line rather than casting our lot with expensive and risky technology like nuclear power.  The administration is choosing to ignore both the costs and the risks associated with nuclear power; including the lack of a safe disposal for nuclear waste, the heightened risk of proliferation of nuclear materials into the hands of terrorists, and the extraordinary costs associated with nuclear power.