logo

Fact Sheet

When it comes to global warming, there’s a lot at stake for North Carolina

Left unchecked, global warming will have serious impacts on North Carolina’s natural environment, its economy, and its and way of life.

 The state’s over 3,000 miles of tidally-influenced coastline make it the third-most vulnerable state to sea level rise.[1]  Eighty percent of the state’s most popular beaches could erode completely before the end of the century, limiting recreational opportunities and harming North Carolina’s tourist economy.[2]

What’s more, scientists predict higher temperatures will bring longer periods of drought, punctuated by more intense hurricanes and heavy rains.  Warmer temperatures will increase smog in metropolitan areas already beleaguered by air pollution.  And the incidence of insect-borne disease may rise also, as mosquito populations thrive in warm, wet weather.[3]   

Science is clear on the need for immediate, bold action

Many scientists and policy-makers recognize a 2°C increase in global average temperatures over pre-industrial levels as a rough limit beyond which large-scale, dangerous impacts of global warming would become unavoidable.[4] But with temperatures already up by 0.74°C, aggressive action is needed now to cut the pollutants that are warming the planet.[5] 

To avoid catastrophic effects, scientists say that rising global warming emissions should peak no later than 2015, and decline by 80 percent or more below 2000 levels by 2050.[6]

The transportation challenge

Transportation is the second largest source of global warming pollution in North Carolina.[7]  Passenger vehicles—cars, pickups and SUV’s—alone contribute to 25% of the state’s global warming pollution,[8] and with more people driving more miles, the problem is only getting worse.  In fact, vehicle travel miles have increased nearly 30 percent in the last ten years,[9] and will increase another 40 percent by 2020 if those same rates continue.

Clean Cars can slash global warming pollution

Though the nation as a whole has failed to take any meaningful action to cut global warming pollution, the states are already leading the way, especially when it comes to pollution from the transportation sector.  North Carolina can join them.

The nation’s Clean Air Act gives states two options for control of automobile emissions: states may comply with federal standards, or adopt more protective standards—known as the Clean Cars Program.  Unlike the federal standards, the Clean Cars Program will reduce global warming pollution by 34 percent from cars and the lightest passenger trucks by 2016 and by 25 percent from heavier passenger trucks.

Already, 13 states have adopted the Clean Cars Program, and several more have pledged to do so.

The Clean Cars Program would cut global warming pollution by more than 3 million tons annually in North Carolina, and virtually stabilize emissions from the transportation sector—an essential first step towards making the steep reductions necessary to avoid the worst impacts of global warming.

Clean cars:  saving consumers money, enhancing vehicle choice

With gas prices at record highs, consumers are eager for more fuel-efficient vehicles that don’t sacrifice safety, performance, or style.  The Clean Cars Program ensures all the same car and SUV models that Tar Heels are accustomed to—those models just come in more efficient form.  By 2016, consumers can save $20 or more per month on gasoline, even while they are paying off the cost of the car.  After the loan is paid off, they’ll save $40 or more per month.

The Clean Cars program ensures that all cars are more efficient and less polluting.  It also sends a message to the sluggish auto industry: provide more choices in clean, advanced-technology cars.



[1] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Climate Change and North Carolina, September 1998; and James Titus and Charlie Richman, “Maps of Lands Vulnerable to Sea Level Rise: Modeled Elevations Along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts,” Climate Research, 2001.

[2] Okmyung Bin et al., East Carolina University, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Duke University, and Appalachian State University, Impacts of Global Warming on North Carolina’s Coastal Economy, 15 March 2007.

[3] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change and North Carolina, September 1998.

[4] Malte Meinshausen, “What Does a 2˚C Target Mean for Greenhouse Gas Concentrations? A Brief Analysis Based on Multi-Gas Emission Pathways and Several Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty Estimates,” in Hans Joachim Schnellnhuber, ed., Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2006.

[5] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers, 5 February 2007.

[6] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III, Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change, Summary for Policymakers, 2007.

[7] U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, State Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Emissions Detail by State, February 2008.

[8] Data on emissions within the transportation sector was calculated as fuel use multiplied by the carbon co-efficient of each fuel. Fuel use data: Energy Information Administration, State Energy Profiles: North Carolina, 6 March 2008. Carbon co-efficients: Energy Information Administration, Documentation for Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2003, May 2005.

[9] Hardee Cox, Road Inventory Information Section, North Carolina Department of Transportation, personal communication, 18 March 2008.

dreamstime_3417610.jpg